[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALAE=UAok8dazxPj16TAV7rQ_6EZvLBp3t5J2CjweMyECkZAHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 14:55:19 -0800
From: Bobby Jones <rjones@...eworks.com>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] ARM: dts: imx: Add GW5907 board support
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 2:06 PM Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 6:44 PM Robert Jones <rjones@...eworks.com> wrote:
> >
> > The Gateworks GW5907 is an IMX6 SoC based single board computer with:
> > - IMX6Q or IMX6DL
> > - 32bit DDR3 DRAM
> > - FEC GbE Phy
> > - bi-color front-panel LED
> > - 256MB NAND boot device
> > - Gateworks System Controller (hwmon, pushbutton controller, EEPROM)
> > - Digital IO expander (pca9555)
> > - Joystick 12bit adc (ads1015)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Robert Jones <rjones@...eworks.com>
>
> Not clear on the authorship on this patch.
>
> If the original author is Tim, then his name should appear in the From field.
>
Original author for all but the GW5910 patch was myself. It's probably
not clear here but Tim reviewed the patches prior to submission and
had me add him as a Signed-off-by.
Would it be better to just remove those lines from the patches in this case?
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 2 +
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-gw5907.dts | 14 ++
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-gw5907.dts | 14 ++
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-gw5907.dtsi | 399 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 429 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl-gw5907.dts
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-gw5907.dts
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-gw5907.dtsi
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> > index 1e9e1af..9ee80e2 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
> > @@ -422,6 +422,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX6Q) += \
> > imx6dl-gw560x.dtb \
> > imx6dl-gw5903.dtb \
> > imx6dl-gw5904.dtb \
> > + imx6dl-gw5907.dtb \
>
> You should add an additional patch that add these new boards in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
So I was planning on just adding an enum line for "gw,ventana" under
the i.MX6DL and i.MX6Q based Boards sections. Would that be
sufficient?
We have a lot of individual custom boards and it doesn't seem correct
to add individual strings for every one in both sections.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists