[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200102141910.GA4020603@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 15:19:10 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
Cc: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
valdis.kletnieks@...edu, hch@....de, sj1557.seo@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 12/13] exfat: add exfat in fs/Kconfig and fs/Makefile
On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 10:07:16PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> >> index 98be354fdb61..2c7ea7e0a95b 100644
> >> --- a/fs/Makefile
> >> +++ b/fs/Makefile
> >> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLBFS) += hugetlbfs/
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_CODA_FS) += coda/
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_MINIX_FS) += minix/
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_FAT_FS) += fat/
> >> +obj-$(CONFIG_EXFAT) += exfat/
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_BFS_FS) += bfs/
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_ISO9660_FS) += isofs/
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_HFSPLUS_FS) += hfsplus/ # Before hfs to find wrapped HFS+
> >
> > Seems that all filesystems have _FS suffix in their config names. So
> > should not have exfat config also same convention? CONFIG_EXFAT_FS?
> Yeah, I know, However, That name conflicts with staging/exfat.
> So I subtracted _FS suffix.
If it's a problem, please send me a patch to rename the staging/exfat/
config option so that you can use the "real" one someday soon.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists