linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 10/13] exfat: add nls operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200102135502.hkey7z45gnprinpp@pali>
Date:   Thu, 2 Jan 2020 14:55:02 +0100
From:   Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
To:     Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, valdis.kletnieks@...edu, hch@....de,
        sj1557.seo@...sung.com, linkinjeon@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 10/13] exfat: add nls operations

On Thursday 02 January 2020 16:20:33 Namjae Jeon wrote:
> This adds the implementation of nls operations for exfat.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>
> ---
>  fs/exfat/nls.c | 809 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 809 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 fs/exfat/nls.c
> 
> diff --git a/fs/exfat/nls.c b/fs/exfat/nls.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..af52328e28ff
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/fs/exfat/nls.c

...

> +int exfat_nls_uni16s_to_vfsname(struct super_block *sb,
> +		struct exfat_uni_name *uniname, unsigned char *p_cstring,
> +		int buflen)
> +{
> +	if (EXFAT_SB(sb)->options.utf8)
> +		return __exfat_nls_utf16s_to_vfsname(sb, uniname, p_cstring,
> +				buflen);
> +	return __exfat_nls_uni16s_to_vfsname(sb, uniname, p_cstring, buflen);
> +}

Hello, I'm looking at this function and basically it do nothing.
Or was it supposed that this function should do something more for UTF-8
encoding?

There is one if- statement, but in both branches is executed exactly
same code.

And executed function just pass same arguments as current callee
function.

So calls to exfat_nls_uni16s_to_vfsname() can be replaced by direct
calls to __exfat_nls_uni16s_to_vfsname().

Or maybe better, rename __exfat_nls_uni16s_to_vfsname() function to
exfat_nls_uni16s_to_vfsname().

> +int exfat_nls_vfsname_to_uni16s(struct super_block *sb,
> +		const unsigned char *p_cstring, const int len,
> +		struct exfat_uni_name *uniname, int *p_lossy)
> +{
> +	if (EXFAT_SB(sb)->options.utf8)
> +		return __exfat_nls_vfsname_to_utf16s(sb, p_cstring, len,
> +				uniname, p_lossy);
> +	return __exfat_nls_vfsname_to_uni16s(sb, p_cstring, len, uniname,
> +			p_lossy);
> +}

And same for this function.

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@...il.com