[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200102131053.kmvmik7aumctrih2@pali>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 14:10:53 +0100
From: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
Cc: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, valdis.kletnieks@...edu, hch@....de,
sj1557.seo@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 12/13] exfat: add exfat in fs/Kconfig and fs/Makefile
On Thursday 02 January 2020 22:07:16 Namjae Jeon wrote:
> >> index 98be354fdb61..2c7ea7e0a95b 100644
> >> --- a/fs/Makefile
> >> +++ b/fs/Makefile
> >> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLBFS) += hugetlbfs/
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_CODA_FS) += coda/
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_MINIX_FS) += minix/
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_FAT_FS) += fat/
> >> +obj-$(CONFIG_EXFAT) += exfat/
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_BFS_FS) += bfs/
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_ISO9660_FS) += isofs/
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_HFSPLUS_FS) += hfsplus/ # Before hfs to find wrapped HFS+
> >
> > Seems that all filesystems have _FS suffix in their config names. So
> > should not have exfat config also same convention? CONFIG_EXFAT_FS?
> Yeah, I know, However, That name conflicts with staging/exfat.
> So I subtracted _FS suffix.
Maybe it is a good idea to drop conflicting implementation prior merging
this series? Or at least renaming conflicting name?
You already wrote that it is "random previous snaphot" which does not
sounds as something we would like to use or support.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@...il.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists