[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKYAXd9Y6o+a7q_yismLP8nNXOUqrudC3KW8N6Z05OghYLt1jg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 22:07:16 +0900
From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
To: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Cc: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, valdis.kletnieks@...edu, hch@....de,
sj1557.seo@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 12/13] exfat: add exfat in fs/Kconfig and fs/Makefile
>> index 98be354fdb61..2c7ea7e0a95b 100644
>> --- a/fs/Makefile
>> +++ b/fs/Makefile
>> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLBFS) += hugetlbfs/
>> obj-$(CONFIG_CODA_FS) += coda/
>> obj-$(CONFIG_MINIX_FS) += minix/
>> obj-$(CONFIG_FAT_FS) += fat/
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_EXFAT) += exfat/
>> obj-$(CONFIG_BFS_FS) += bfs/
>> obj-$(CONFIG_ISO9660_FS) += isofs/
>> obj-$(CONFIG_HFSPLUS_FS) += hfsplus/ # Before hfs to find wrapped HFS+
>
> Seems that all filesystems have _FS suffix in their config names. So
> should not have exfat config also same convention? CONFIG_EXFAT_FS?
Yeah, I know, However, That name conflicts with staging/exfat.
So I subtracted _FS suffix.
>
> --
> Pali Rohár
> pali.rohar@...il.com
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists