[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200102125830.z2uz673dlsdttjvo@pali>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 13:58:30 +0100
From: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
To: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, valdis.kletnieks@...edu, hch@....de,
sj1557.seo@...sung.com, linkinjeon@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 12/13] exfat: add exfat in fs/Kconfig and fs/Makefile
On Thursday 02 January 2020 16:20:35 Namjae Jeon wrote:
> Add exfat in fs/Kconfig and fs/Makefile.
>
> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>
> ---
> fs/Kconfig | 3 ++-
> fs/Makefile | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig
> index 7b623e9fc1b0..5edd87eb5c13 100644
> --- a/fs/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/Kconfig
> @@ -139,9 +139,10 @@ endmenu
> endif # BLOCK
>
> if BLOCK
> -menu "DOS/FAT/NT Filesystems"
> +menu "DOS/FAT/EXFAT/NT Filesystems"
>
> source "fs/fat/Kconfig"
> +source "fs/exfat/Kconfig"
> source "fs/ntfs/Kconfig"
>
> endmenu
> diff --git a/fs/Makefile b/fs/Makefile
> index 98be354fdb61..2c7ea7e0a95b 100644
> --- a/fs/Makefile
> +++ b/fs/Makefile
> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLBFS) += hugetlbfs/
> obj-$(CONFIG_CODA_FS) += coda/
> obj-$(CONFIG_MINIX_FS) += minix/
> obj-$(CONFIG_FAT_FS) += fat/
> +obj-$(CONFIG_EXFAT) += exfat/
> obj-$(CONFIG_BFS_FS) += bfs/
> obj-$(CONFIG_ISO9660_FS) += isofs/
> obj-$(CONFIG_HFSPLUS_FS) += hfsplus/ # Before hfs to find wrapped HFS+
Seems that all filesystems have _FS suffix in their config names. So
should not have exfat config also same convention? CONFIG_EXFAT_FS?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@...il.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists