| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200105085921.GB7261@rapoport-lnx>
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2020 10:59:22 +0200
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Collin Walling <walling@...ux.ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>,
Philipp Rudo <prudo@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] mm/memblock: Define memblock_physmem()
Hi Anshuman,
On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 02:11:06PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On s390 platform memblock.physmem array is being built by directly calling
> into memblock_add_range() which is a low level function not intended to be
> used outside of memblock. Hence lets conditionally add helper functions for
> physmem array when HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP is enabled. Also use MAX_NUMNODES
> instead of 0 as node ID similar to memblock_add() and memblock_reserve().
> While here replace some function name strings with (%s __func__) in various
> memblock_dbg() call sites.
I'd prefer to have memblock_dbg() updates as a separate patch.
> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
> Cc: Collin Walling <walling@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>
> Cc: Philipp Rudo <prudo@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
> ---
> Only build tested for s390, will appreciate if some one can give it a try
> on a real system.
>
> arch/s390/kernel/setup.c | 14 ++++----------
> include/linux/memblock.h | 3 +++
> mm/memblock.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
> index 9cbf490fd162..79a7b1872e5a 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -761,14 +761,6 @@ static void __init free_mem_detect_info(void)
> memblock_free(start, size);
> }
>
> -static void __init memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t size)
> -{
> - memblock_dbg("memblock_physmem_add: [%#016llx-%#016llx]\n",
> - start, start + size - 1);
> - memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, start, size, 0, 0);
> - memblock_add_range(&memblock.physmem, start, size, 0, 0);
> -}
> -
> static const char * __init get_mem_info_source(void)
> {
> switch (mem_detect.info_source) {
> @@ -793,8 +785,10 @@ static void __init memblock_add_mem_detect_info(void)
> get_mem_info_source(), mem_detect.info_source);
> /* keep memblock lists close to the kernel */
> memblock_set_bottom_up(true);
> - for_each_mem_detect_block(i, &start, &end)
> - memblock_physmem_add(start, end - start);
> + for_each_mem_detect_block(i, &start, &end) {
> + memblock_add(start, end - start);
> + memblock_physmem(start, end - start);
Maybe memblock_physmem_add()?
And, since memblock_add_range() will actually become private, cab you
please make it static?
> + }
> memblock_set_bottom_up(false);
> memblock_dump_all();
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> index 1510b12de031..d17e7b841cb6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> @@ -115,6 +115,9 @@ int memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> int memblock_remove(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> int memblock_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> int memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP
> +int memblock_physmem(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> +#endif
> void memblock_trim_memory(phys_addr_t align);
> bool memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type,
> phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 3e20c6ba2101..f6d17a1f30e3 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> {
> phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
>
> - memblock_dbg("memblock_add: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
> + memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
> &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
>
> return memblock_add_range(&memblock.memory, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
> @@ -795,7 +795,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_remove(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> {
> phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
>
> - memblock_dbg("memblock_remove: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
> + memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
> &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
>
> return memblock_remove_range(&memblock.memory, base, size);
> @@ -813,7 +813,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> {
> phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
>
> - memblock_dbg(" memblock_free: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
> + memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
> &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
>
> kmemleak_free_part_phys(base, size);
> @@ -824,12 +824,24 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> {
> phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
>
> - memblock_dbg("memblock_reserve: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n",
> + memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
> &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
>
> return memblock_add_range(&memblock.reserved, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP
> +int __init_memblock memblock_physmem(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> +{
> + phys_addr_t end = base + size - 1;
> +
> + memblock_dbg("%s: [%pa-%pa] %pS\n", __func__,
> + &base, &end, (void *)_RET_IP_);
> +
> + return memblock_add_range(&memblock.physmem, base, size, MAX_NUMNODES, 0);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> /**
> * memblock_setclr_flag - set or clear flag for a memory region
> * @base: base address of the region
> --
> 2.20.1
>
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists