[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200106054041-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 05:50:34 -0500
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc: "virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: vhost changes (batched) in linux-next after 12/13 trigger random
crashes in KVM guests after reboot
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 04:59:02PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 18.12.19 16:10, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 03:43:43PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >> Michael,
> >>
> >> with
> >> commit db7286b100b503ef80612884453bed53d74c9a16 (refs/bisect/skip-db7286b100b503ef80612884453bed53d74c9a16)
> >> vhost: use batched version by default
> >> plus
> >> commit 6bd262d5eafcdf8cdfae491e2e748e4e434dcda6 (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad)
> >> Revert "vhost/net: add an option to test new code"
> >> to make things compile (your next tree is not easily bisectable, can you fix that as well?).
> >
> > I'll try.
> >
> >>
> >> I get random crashes in my s390 KVM guests after reboot.
> >> Reverting both patches together with commit decd9b8 "vhost: use vhost_desc instead of vhost_log" to
> >> make it compile again) on top of linux-next-1218 makes the problem go away.
> >>
> >> Looks like the batched version is not yet ready for prime time. Can you drop these patches until
> >> we have fixed the issues?
> >>
> >> Christian
> >>
> >
> > Will do, thanks for letting me know.
>
> I have confirmed with the initial reporter (internal test team) that <driver name='qemu'/>
> with a known to be broken linux next kernel also fixes the problem, so it is really the
> vhost changes.
OK I'm back and trying to make it more bisectable.
I pushed a new tag "batch-v2".
It's same code but with this bisect should get more information.
I suspect one of the following:
commit 1414d7ee3d10d2ec2bc4ee652d1d90ec91da1c79
Author: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
Date: Mon Oct 7 06:11:18 2019 -0400
vhost: batching fetches
With this patch applied, new and old code perform identically.
Lots of extra optimizations are now possible, e.g.
we can fetch multiple heads with copy_from/to_user now.
We can get rid of maintaining the log array. Etc etc.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
commit 50297a8480b439efc5f3f23088cb2d90b799acef
Author: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
Date: Wed Dec 11 12:19:26 2019 -0500
vhost: use batched version by default
As testing shows no performance change, switch to that now.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
and would like to know which.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists