lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <08ae8d28-3d8c-04e8-bdeb-0117d06c6dc7@de.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Jan 2020 09:59:16 +0100
From:   Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:     "virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
        <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: vhost changes (batched) in linux-next after 12/13 trigger random
 crashes in KVM guests after reboot



On 06.01.20 11:50, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 04:59:02PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> On 18.12.19 16:10, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 03:43:43PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>> Michael,
>>>>
>>>> with 
>>>> commit db7286b100b503ef80612884453bed53d74c9a16 (refs/bisect/skip-db7286b100b503ef80612884453bed53d74c9a16)
>>>>     vhost: use batched version by default
>>>> plus
>>>> commit 6bd262d5eafcdf8cdfae491e2e748e4e434dcda6 (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad)
>>>>     Revert "vhost/net: add an option to test new code"
>>>> to make things compile (your next tree is not easily bisectable, can you fix that as well?).
>>>
>>> I'll try.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I get random crashes in my s390 KVM guests after reboot.
>>>> Reverting both patches together with commit decd9b8 "vhost: use vhost_desc instead of vhost_log" to
>>>> make it compile again) on top of linux-next-1218 makes the problem go away.
>>>>
>>>> Looks like the batched version is not yet ready for prime time. Can you drop these patches until
>>>> we have fixed the issues?
>>>>
>>>> Christian
>>>>
>>>
>>> Will do, thanks for letting me know.
>>
>> I have confirmed with the initial reporter (internal test team) that <driver name='qemu'/> 
>> with a known to be broken linux next kernel also fixes the problem, so it is really the
>> vhost changes.
> 
> OK I'm back and trying to make it more bisectable.
> 
> I pushed a new tag "batch-v2".
> It's same code but with this bisect should get more information.

I get the following with this tag

drivers/vhost/net.c: In function ‘vhost_net_tx_get_vq_desc’:
drivers/vhost/net.c:574:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘vhost_get_vq_desc_batch’; did you mean ‘vhost_get_vq_desc’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  574 |   r = vhost_get_vq_desc_batch(tvq, tvq->iov, ARRAY_SIZE(tvq->iov),
      |       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |       vhost_get_vq_desc


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ