linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/7] doc/RCU/rcu: Use https instead of http if possible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200106183543.GN13449@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Date:   Mon, 6 Jan 2020 10:35:43 -0800
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     madhuparnabhowmik04@...il.com
Cc:     sj38.park@...il.com, joel@...lfernandes.or, frextrite@...il.com,
        corbet@....net, rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] doc/RCU/rcu: Use https instead of http if possible

On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 06:59:51PM +0530, madhuparnabhowmik04@...il.com wrote:
> From: sj38.park@...il.com
> 
> From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
> 
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
> 
> Hi SeongJae,
> 
> The patch looks fine, but I am not sure if this change is required.
> What do you think Paul?

Thank you, Madhuparna!  This change might not be absolutely required,
but it is a good change.

SeongJae, could you please include Madhuparna's pair of Reviewed-by
tags and also make your email address consistent in your next posting?
You currently have both sj38.park@...il.com and sjpark@...zon.de.
Either is fine.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

> Thanks,
> Madhuparna
> 
> ---
>  Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst b/Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst
> index 2a830c51477e..0e03c6ef3147 100644
> --- a/Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ Frequently Asked Questions
>    Of these, one was allowed to lapse by the assignee, and the
>    others have been contributed to the Linux kernel under GPL.
>    There are now also LGPL implementations of user-level RCU
> -  available (http://liburcu.org/).
> +  available (https://liburcu.org/).
>  
>  - I hear that RCU needs work in order to support realtime kernels?
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
>