lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200106190212.20255-1-sj38.park@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon,  6 Jan 2020 20:02:12 +0100
From:   SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc:     madhuparnabhowmik04@...il.com, sj38.park@...il.com,
        joel@...lfernandes.or, frextrite@...il.com, corbet@....net,
        rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 6/7] doc/RCU/rcu: Use https instead of http if possible

On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 10:35:43 -0800 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 06:59:51PM +0530, madhuparnabhowmik04@...il.com wrote:
> > From: sj38.park@...il.com
> > 
> > From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
> > 
> > Hi SeongJae,
> > 
> > The patch looks fine, but I am not sure if this change is required.
> > What do you think Paul?
> 
> Thank you, Madhuparna!  This change might not be absolutely required,
> but it is a good change.

Sorry for late reply, Madhuparna.  I made this patch because I seen a commit
converting http urls to https url for a document.  However, I couldn't find the
commit again.  Maybe my confusion.  So, please drop this if you have any doubt,
Paul.

> 
> SeongJae, could you please include Madhuparna's pair of Reviewed-by
> tags and also make your email address consistent in your next posting?
> You currently have both sj38.park@...il.com and sjpark@...zon.de.
> Either is fine.  ;-)

Yes, of course, and sorry for the mistake.  I will use sjpark@...zon.de for
this patchset.  Will send the second version soon.


Thanks,
SeongJae Park

> 
> 							Thanx, Paul
> 
> > Thanks,
> > Madhuparna
> > 
> > ---
> >  Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst b/Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst
> > index 2a830c51477e..0e03c6ef3147 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst
> > @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ Frequently Asked Questions
> >    Of these, one was allowed to lapse by the assignee, and the
> >    others have been contributed to the Linux kernel under GPL.
> >    There are now also LGPL implementations of user-level RCU
> > -  available (http://liburcu.org/).
> > +  available (https://liburcu.org/).
> >  
> >  - I hear that RCU needs work in order to support realtime kernels?
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.17.1
> > 
> > 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ