[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200106190212.20255-1-sj38.park@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 20:02:12 +0100
From: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: madhuparnabhowmik04@...il.com, sj38.park@...il.com,
joel@...lfernandes.or, frextrite@...il.com, corbet@....net,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 6/7] doc/RCU/rcu: Use https instead of http if possible
On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 10:35:43 -0800 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 06:59:51PM +0530, madhuparnabhowmik04@...il.com wrote:
> > From: sj38.park@...il.com
> >
> > From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
> >
> > Hi SeongJae,
> >
> > The patch looks fine, but I am not sure if this change is required.
> > What do you think Paul?
>
> Thank you, Madhuparna! This change might not be absolutely required,
> but it is a good change.
Sorry for late reply, Madhuparna. I made this patch because I seen a commit
converting http urls to https url for a document. However, I couldn't find the
commit again. Maybe my confusion. So, please drop this if you have any doubt,
Paul.
>
> SeongJae, could you please include Madhuparna's pair of Reviewed-by
> tags and also make your email address consistent in your next posting?
> You currently have both sj38.park@...il.com and sjpark@...zon.de.
> Either is fine. ;-)
Yes, of course, and sorry for the mistake. I will use sjpark@...zon.de for
this patchset. Will send the second version soon.
Thanks,
SeongJae Park
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> > Thanks,
> > Madhuparna
> >
> > ---
> > Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst b/Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst
> > index 2a830c51477e..0e03c6ef3147 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst
> > @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ Frequently Asked Questions
> > Of these, one was allowed to lapse by the assignee, and the
> > others have been contributed to the Linux kernel under GPL.
> > There are now also LGPL implementations of user-level RCU
> > - available (http://liburcu.org/).
> > + available (https://liburcu.org/).
> >
> > - I hear that RCU needs work in order to support realtime kernels?
> >
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists