lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 11:39:01 +0100 From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> Cc: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>, Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>, "moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM..." <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com, "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: lochnagar: select GPIOLIB On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 10:45 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 5:37 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote: > > I wonder if GPIOLIB should just become mandatory when enabling the pinctrl > > subsystem, or if there are still good reasons for leaving it disabled > > on any machine that uses CONFIG_PINCTRL. > > Hm that is a tricky question, they almost always come in pair but are > technically speaking separate subsystems. I think there are a number of use cases for GPIOLIB drivers without PINCTRL, but are there any examples of the reverse? Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists