linux-kernel - Re: dma-direct: don't check swiotlb=force in dma_direct_map

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Jan 2020 18:18:28 +0000
From:   Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>, hch@....de,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc:     m.szyprowski@...sung.com, linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: dma-direct: don't check swiotlb=force in dma_direct_map_resource

On 07/01/2020 5:38 pm, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> Following build error on stable-rc 5.4.9-rc1 for arm architecture.
> 
> dma/direct.c: In function 'dma_direct_possible':
> dma/direct.c:329:3: error: too many arguments to function 'dma_capable'
>     dma_capable(dev, dma_addr, size, true);
>     ^~~~~~~~~~~

Not sure that $SUBJECT comes into it at all, but by the look of it I 
guess "dma-direct: exclude dma_direct_map_resource from the min_low_pfn 
check" implicitly depends on 130c1ccbf553 ("dma-direct: unify the 
dma_capable definitions") too.

Robin.

> In file included from
> /srv/oe/build/tmp-lkft-glibc/work-shared/am57xx-evm/kernel-source/include/linux/dma-direct.h:12:0,
>                   from
> /srv/oe/build/tmp-lkft-glibc/work-shared/am57xx-evm/kernel-source/kernel/dma/direct.c:10:
> /srv/oe/build/tmp-lkft-glibc/work-shared/am57xx-evm/kernel-source/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-direct.h:17:20:
> note: declared here
>   static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr,
> size_t size)
>                      ^~~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from
> /srv/oe/build/tmp-lkft-glibc/work-shared/am57xx-evm/kernel-source/include/linux/init.h:5:0,
>                   from
> /srv/oe/build/tmp-lkft-glibc/work-shared/am57xx-evm/kernel-source/include/linux/memblock.h:12,
>                   from
> /srv/oe/build/tmp-lkft-glibc/work-shared/am57xx-evm/kernel-source/kernel/dma/direct.c:7:
> dma/direct.c: In function 'dma_direct_map_resource':
> dma/direct.c:378:16: error: too many arguments to function 'dma_capable'
>    if (unlikely(!dma_capable(dev, dma_addr, size, false))) {
>                  ^
> /srv/oe/build/tmp-lkft-glibc/work-shared/am57xx-evm/kernel-source/include/linux/compiler.h:78:42:
> note: in definition of macro 'unlikely'
>   # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
>                                            ^
> In file included from
> /srv/oe/build/tmp-lkft-glibc/work-shared/am57xx-evm/kernel-source/include/linux/dma-direct.h:12:0,
>                   from
> /srv/oe/build/tmp-lkft-glibc/work-shared/am57xx-evm/kernel-source/kernel/dma/direct.c:10:
> /srv/oe/build/tmp-lkft-glibc/work-shared/am57xx-evm/kernel-source/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-direct.h:17:20:
> note: declared here
>   static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr,
> size_t size)
>                      ^~~~~~~~~~~
> /srv/oe/build/tmp-lkft-glibc/work-shared/am57xx-evm/kernel-source/scripts/Makefile.build:265:
> recipe for target 'kernel/dma/direct.o' failed
> 
> Full build log link,
> https://ci.linaro.org/view/lkft/job/openembedded-lkft-linux-stable-rc-5.4/DISTRO=lkft,MACHINE=am57xx-evm,label=docker-lkft/44/consoleText
>