[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200107182636.GA2021584@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 19:26:36 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>, hch@....de,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: dma-direct: don't check swiotlb=force in dma_direct_map_resource
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 06:18:28PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 07/01/2020 5:38 pm, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > Following build error on stable-rc 5.4.9-rc1 for arm architecture.
> >
> > dma/direct.c: In function 'dma_direct_possible':
> > dma/direct.c:329:3: error: too many arguments to function 'dma_capable'
> > dma_capable(dev, dma_addr, size, true);
> > ^~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Not sure that $SUBJECT comes into it at all, but by the look of it I guess
> "dma-direct: exclude dma_direct_map_resource from the min_low_pfn check"
> implicitly depends on 130c1ccbf553 ("dma-direct: unify the dma_capable
> definitions") too.
Ugh, good catch. I'll drop these patches, they don't look ok for stable
at this point in time.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists