linux-kernel - [PATCH] regulator: bd718x7: Simplify the code by removing struct bd718xx_pmic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200108014256.11282-1-axel.lin@ingics.com>
Date:   Wed,  8 Jan 2020 09:42:55 +0800
From:   Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: bd718x7: Simplify the code by removing struct bd718xx_pmic_inits

Nowdays ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_AMOUNT includes not only BD71837/BD71847 but also
BD70528/BD71828 which are not supported by this driver. So it seems not
necessay to have pmic_regulators[ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_AMOUNT] as mapping table.
Simplify the code by removing struct bd718xx_pmic_inits and
pmic_regulators[ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_AMOUNT].

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
---
 drivers/regulator/bd718x7-regulator.c | 34 +++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/bd718x7-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/bd718x7-regulator.c
index 13a43eee2e46..8f9b2d8eaf10 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/bd718x7-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/bd718x7-regulator.c
@@ -1142,28 +1142,14 @@ static const struct bd718xx_regulator_data bd71837_regulators[] = {
 	},
 };
 
-struct bd718xx_pmic_inits {
-	const struct bd718xx_regulator_data *r_datas;
-	unsigned int r_amount;
-};
-
 static int bd718xx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct bd718xx *mfd;
 	struct regulator_config config = { 0 };
-	struct bd718xx_pmic_inits pmic_regulators[ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_AMOUNT] = {
-		[ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71837] = {
-			.r_datas = bd71837_regulators,
-			.r_amount = ARRAY_SIZE(bd71837_regulators),
-		},
-		[ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71847] = {
-			.r_datas = bd71847_regulators,
-			.r_amount = ARRAY_SIZE(bd71847_regulators),
-		},
-	};
-
 	int i, j, err;
 	bool use_snvs;
+	const struct bd718xx_regulator_data *reg_data;
+	unsigned int num_reg_data;
 
 	mfd = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
 	if (!mfd) {
@@ -1172,8 +1158,16 @@ static int bd718xx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		goto err;
 	}
 
-	if (mfd->chip.chip_type >= ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_AMOUNT ||
-	    !pmic_regulators[mfd->chip.chip_type].r_datas) {
+	switch (mfd->chip.chip_type) {
+	case ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71837:
+		reg_data = bd71837_regulators;
+		num_reg_data = ARRAY_SIZE(bd71837_regulators);
+		break;
+	case ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71847:
+		reg_data = bd71847_regulators;
+		num_reg_data = ARRAY_SIZE(bd71847_regulators);
+		break;
+	default:
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unsupported chip type\n");
 		err = -EINVAL;
 		goto err;
@@ -1215,13 +1209,13 @@ static int bd718xx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		}
 	}
 
-	for (i = 0; i < pmic_regulators[mfd->chip.chip_type].r_amount; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < num_reg_data; i++) {
 
 		const struct regulator_desc *desc;
 		struct regulator_dev *rdev;
 		const struct bd718xx_regulator_data *r;
 
-		r = &pmic_regulators[mfd->chip.chip_type].r_datas[i];
+		r = &reg_data[i];
 		desc = &r->desc;
 
 		config.dev = pdev->dev.parent;
-- 
2.20.1