lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200108150245.GA10975@lst.de>
Date:   Wed, 8 Jan 2020 16:02:45 +0100
From:   "hch@....de" <hch@....de>
To:     Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@....com>
Cc:     Balbir Singh <sblbir@...zon.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        "ssomesh@...zon.com" <ssomesh@...zon.com>,
        "jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "hch@....de" <hch@....de>, "mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [resend v1 1/5] block/genhd: Notify udev about capacity change

On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 06:16:39AM +0000, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> Since disk_set_capacity(() is on the same line as set_capacity()
> we should follow the same convention, which is :-
> 
> 1. Avoid exporting symbol.
> 2. Mark new function in-line.
> 
> Unless there is a very specific reason for breaking the pattern.

Why would we mark it as inline?  It isn't by any means in the fast
path, and there are no easy opportunities for constant propagation,
so the only thing that would do is increase the code size.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ