[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <67e12177f1dc95f1387c5c3ee138343c@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2020 11:02:45 +0800
From: Rocky Liao <rjliao@...eaurora.org>
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc: marcel@...tmann.org, johan.hedberg@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-bluetooth-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Add qca_power_on() API to support
both wcn399x and Rome power up
Hi Matt,
在 2020-01-08 01:31,Matthias Kaehlcke 写道:
> Hi Rocky,
>
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 01:26:01PM +0800, Rocky Liao wrote:
>> This patch adds a unified API qca_power_on() to support both wcn399x
>> and
>> Rome power on. For wcn399x it calls the qca_wcn3990_init() to init the
>> regulators, and for Rome it pulls up the bt_en GPIO to power up the
>> btsoc.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rocky Liao <rjliao@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> index 9392cc7f9908..f6555bd1adbc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> @@ -1532,6 +1532,27 @@ static int qca_wcn3990_init(struct hci_uart
>> *hu)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static int qca_power_on(struct hci_dev *hdev)
>> +{
>> + struct hci_uart *hu = hci_get_drvdata(hdev);
>> + enum qca_btsoc_type soc_type = qca_soc_type(hu);
>> + struct qca_serdev *qcadev;
>> + int ret = 0;
>
> another option would be to return directly from the if/else branches,
> but either way is fine.
>
>> +
>> + if (qca_is_wcn399x(soc_type)) {
>> + ret = qca_wcn3990_init(hu);
>> + } else {
>> + if (hu->serdev) {
>> + qcadev = serdev_device_get_drvdata(hu->serdev);
>> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(qcadev->bt_en, 1);
>> + /* Controller needs time to bootup. */
>> + msleep(150);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>
> I expected qca_power_on() would be called from qca_open(), but as is
> this would only work for ROME, and not WCN399x, which only enables
> the regulators in qca_open(), qca_wcn3990_init() is called from
> qca_setup(). Is there a particular reason for this assymmetry between
> the ROME and WCN399x initialization (i.e. one is fully powered up after
> open(), the other not)?
I prefer to move the power on call from qca_open() to qca_setup() for
Rome,
I don't see any reason for this difference with wcn399x.I will send
patch for
this if you have no concern.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists