[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cc8dddbcad70453efad665dc19787803ec48fdd6.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 08:12:27 -0500
From: "Ewan D. Milne" <emilne@...hat.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"hch@....de" <hch@....de>
Cc: "axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"Chaitanya.Kulkarni@....com" <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@....com>,
"mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>,
"jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"Sangaraju, Someswarudu" <ssomesh@...zon.com>,
"Singh, Balbir" <sblbir@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [resend v1 4/5] drivers/nvme/host/core.c: Convert to use
disk_set_capacity
On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 22:33 -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> Christoph,
>
> > > The expected behaviour is not clear, but the functionality is not
> > > broken, user space should be able to deal with a resize event where
> > > the previous capacity == new capacity IMHO.
> >
> > I think it makes sense to not bother with a notification unless there
> > is an actual change.
>
> I agree.
>
Yes, absolutely.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists