linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: dts: sun8i-r40: Add thermal sensor and thermal zones

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <af4bca3b-ba95-aa10-5601-753f1c5275b3@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 9 Jan 2020 21:08:34 +0100
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc:     Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@...il.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, wens@...e.org, anarsoul@...il.com,
        rui.zhang@...el.com, amit.kucheria@...durent.com,
        megous@...ous.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: dts: sun8i-r40: Add thermal sensor and
 thermal zones

On 09/01/2020 14:13, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 12:51:27PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 07/01/2020 08:58, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 05:46:39PM +0000, Yangtao Li wrote:
>>>> There are two sensors, sensor0 for CPU, sensor1 for GPU.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@...il.com>
>>>> Tested-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
>>>> Tested-on: sun8i-r40-bananapi-m2-ultra
>>>
>>> As far as I know, tested-on is not documented anywhere (and isn't
>>> really used either). I've removed it and applied, thanks!
>>
>> I think this patch should go through my tree as it refers to a commit in
>> my branch.
> 
> I'm not quite sure to get why. Even though that patch depends on the
> one affecting the driver to be functional, it doesn't break anything
> when merged through arm-soc, and similarly yours doesn't affect any
> other tree if it's merged through your tree, so there's no dependency?

Sorry, I puzzled myself, I thought you meant you applied patch 1/2


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog