linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: dts: sun8i-r40: Add thermal sensor and thermal zones

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 26 Jan 2020 21:01:01 +0800
From:   Frank Lee <tiny.windzz@...il.com>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>,
        Ondřej Jirman <megous@...ous.com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: dts: sun8i-r40: Add thermal sensor and
 thermal zones

HI Chen-Yu and Maxime,

Can you pick this up again?

Yangtao

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 4:08 AM Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 09/01/2020 14:13, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 12:51:27PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> On 07/01/2020 08:58, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 05:46:39PM +0000, Yangtao Li wrote:
> >>>> There are two sensors, sensor0 for CPU, sensor1 for GPU.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@...il.com>
> >>>> Tested-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
> >>>> Tested-on: sun8i-r40-bananapi-m2-ultra
> >>>
> >>> As far as I know, tested-on is not documented anywhere (and isn't
> >>> really used either). I've removed it and applied, thanks!
> >>
> >> I think this patch should go through my tree as it refers to a commit in
> >> my branch.
> >
> > I'm not quite sure to get why. Even though that patch depends on the
> > one affecting the driver to be functional, it doesn't break anything
> > when merged through arm-soc, and similarly yours doesn't affect any
> > other tree if it's merged through your tree, so there's no dependency?
>
> Sorry, I puzzled myself, I thought you meant you applied patch 1/2
>
>
> --
>  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
>
> Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
>