lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200110111622.GA39451@bogus>
Date:   Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:16:22 +0000
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     "Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>
Cc:     Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu-topology: Skip the exist but not possible cpu nodes

On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 01:57:34AM +0000, Zengtao (B) wrote:
[...]

> I have the same concern, I have tried to find out some other return values
> But seems not good enough.
> Maybe it's better to introduce a new function to replace of_cpu_node_to_id
> Any good suggestion?
>

No I don't have any. So please drop the extra logic, add a comment on
-ENODEV return value and use it as needed.

--
Regards,
Sudeep

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ