[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200110111622.GA39451@bogus>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:16:22 +0000
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: "Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>
Cc: Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu-topology: Skip the exist but not possible cpu nodes
On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 01:57:34AM +0000, Zengtao (B) wrote:
[...]
> I have the same concern, I have tried to find out some other return values
> But seems not good enough.
> Maybe it's better to introduce a new function to replace of_cpu_node_to_id
> Any good suggestion?
>
No I don't have any. So please drop the extra logic, add a comment on
-ENODEV return value and use it as needed.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists