linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] cpu-topology: Skip the exist but not possible cpu nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED340D6E59@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Date:   Sat, 11 Jan 2020 02:03:46 +0000
From:   "Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
CC:     Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] cpu-topology: Skip the exist but not possible cpu nodes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sudeep Holla [mailto:sudeep.holla@....com]
> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 7:16 PM
> To: Zengtao (B)
> Cc: Linuxarm; Greg Kroah-Hartman; Rafael J. Wysocki;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Sudeep Holla
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu-topology: Skip the exist but not possible cpu
> nodes
> 
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 01:57:34AM +0000, Zengtao (B) wrote:
> [...]
> 
> > I have the same concern, I have tried to find out some other return
> values
> > But seems not good enough.
> > Maybe it's better to introduce a new function to replace
> of_cpu_node_to_id
> > Any good suggestion?
> >
> 
> No I don't have any. So please drop the extra logic, add a comment on
> -ENODEV return value and use it as needed.

OK, I will address the review comments and send v2.
Thanks 

Zengtao