[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200111175611.GA422540@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 18:56:11 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
Cc: valdis.kletnieks@...edu, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>, amir73il@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: exfat: make staging/exfat and fs/exfat mutually
exclusive
On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 09:14:19PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
>
> Make staging/exfat and fs/exfat mutually exclusive to select the one
> between two same filesystem.
>
> Suggested-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/exfat/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/exfat/Kconfig b/drivers/staging/exfat/Kconfig
> index 292a19dfcaf5..9a0fccec65d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/exfat/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/staging/exfat/Kconfig
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> config STAGING_EXFAT_FS
> tristate "exFAT fs support"
> - depends on BLOCK
> + depends on BLOCK && !EXFAT_FS
There is no such symbol in the kernel tree, so this isn't going to do
anything :(
When/if EXFAT_FS does show up, I will be glad to add this. Or better
yet, just have this as part of the "real" exfat patchset, that would
make the most sense, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists