linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: exfat: make staging/exfat and fs/exfat mutually exclusive

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKYAXd-+o-cmn17r0Z-k9gmrQW=8Pj_PDFNvG+jP8eCSPDbV9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 12 Jan 2020 08:35:20 +0900
From:   Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     valdis.kletnieks@...edu, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>, amir73il@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: exfat: make staging/exfat and fs/exfat mutually exclusive

2020-01-12 2:56 GMT+09:00, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 09:14:19PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
>> From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
>>
>> Make staging/exfat and fs/exfat mutually exclusive to select the one
>> between two same filesystem.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/staging/exfat/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/exfat/Kconfig
>> b/drivers/staging/exfat/Kconfig
>> index 292a19dfcaf5..9a0fccec65d9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/exfat/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/exfat/Kconfig
>> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>  config STAGING_EXFAT_FS
>>  	tristate "exFAT fs support"
>> -	depends on BLOCK
>> +	depends on BLOCK && !EXFAT_FS
>
> There is no such symbol in the kernel tree, so this isn't going to do
> anything :(
>
> When/if EXFAT_FS does show up, I will be glad to add this.  Or better
> yet, just have this as part of the "real" exfat patchset, that would
> make the most sense, right?
Right,
Thanks!
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>