[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.9999.2001121011100.160130@viisi.sifive.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 10:12:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
To: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>
cc: green.hu@...il.com, greentime@...nel.org, palmer@...belt.com,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
schwab@...e.de, anup@...infault.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] riscv: make sure the cores stay looping in
.Lsecondary_park
Hi Greentime,
On Thu, 9 Jan 2020, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2020, Greentime Hu wrote:
>
> > The code in secondary_park is currently placed in the .init section. The
> > kernel reclaims and clears this code when it finishes booting. That
> > causes the cores parked in it to go to somewhere unpredictable, so we
> > move this function out of init to make sure the cores stay looping there.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
>
> Thanks, the following is what's been queued for v5.5-rc.
During final testing, when building the kernel with an initramfs, I hit
the following linker error:
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
arch/riscv/kernel/head.o: in function `.L0 ':(.init.text+0x5c): relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_JAL against `.Lsecondary_park'
make[1]: *** [Makefile:1079: vmlinux] Error 1
make: *** [Makefile:326: __build_one_by_one] Error 2
Could you take a look at this?
thanks,
- Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists