lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:16:27 -0800
From:   Rao Shoaib <rao.shoaib@...cle.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc:     monis@...lanox.com, dledford@...hat.com, sean.hefty@...el.com,
        hal.rosenstock@...il.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Introduce maximum WQE size to check limits


On 1/13/20 10:47 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 10:35:14AM -0800, Rao Shoaib wrote:
>> On 12/19/19 10:25 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 11:38:52AM -0800, Rao Shoaib wrote:
>>>> Any update on my patch?
>>>>
>>>> If there is some change needed please let me know.
>>> You need to repost it with the comments addressed
>>>
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11250179/
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>> Jason,
>>
>> Following is a pointer to the patch that I posted in response to your
>> comments
>>
>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg86241.html
>>
>> I posted this on Nov 18. Can you please take a look and let me know what
>> else has to be done.
> You mean this:
>
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg86333.html
>
> ?
>
> Don't mix the inline size and the # SGEs. They both drive the maximum
> WQE size and all the math should be directly connected.
>
> Jason

Nope. I have just resent the patch. Sorry for the confusion.

Shoaib.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists