lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200113184757.GB9861@ziepe.ca>
Date:   Mon, 13 Jan 2020 14:47:57 -0400
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To:     Rao Shoaib <rao.shoaib@...cle.com>
Cc:     monis@...lanox.com, dledford@...hat.com, sean.hefty@...el.com,
        hal.rosenstock@...il.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Introduce maximum WQE size to check limits

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 10:35:14AM -0800, Rao Shoaib wrote:
> 
> On 12/19/19 10:25 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 11:38:52AM -0800, Rao Shoaib wrote:
> > > Any update on my patch?
> > > 
> > > If there is some change needed please let me know.
> > You need to repost it with the comments addressed
> > 
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11250179/
> > 
> > Jason
> > 
> Jason,
> 
> Following is a pointer to the patch that I posted in response to your
> comments
> 
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg86241.html
> 
> I posted this on Nov 18. Can you please take a look and let me know what
> else has to be done.

You mean this:

https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg86333.html

?

Don't mix the inline size and the # SGEs. They both drive the maximum
WQE size and all the math should be directly connected.

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ