[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ffaaf32-88b6-fdf1-c7c7-ab56292c047f@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 09:33:08 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com
Cc: juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, paulmck@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/core: fix illegal RCU from offline CPUs
On 2020/01/13 1:17, Qian Cai wrote:
> In the CPU-offline process, it calls mmdrop() after idle entry and the
> subsequent call to cpuhp_report_idle_dead(). Once execution passes the
> call to rcu_report_dead(), RCU is ignoring the CPU, which results in
> lockdep complaints when mmdrop() uses RCU from either memcg or
> debugobjects. Fix it by scheduling mmdrop() on another online CPU.
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 90e4b00ace89..41fb49f3dfce 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -6194,7 +6194,8 @@ void idle_task_exit(void)
> current->active_mm = &init_mm;
> finish_arch_post_lock_switch();
> }
> - mmdrop(mm);
> + smp_call_function_single(cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask),
> + (void (*)(void *))mmdrop, mm, 0);
mmdrop() might sleep, but
/*
* smp_call_function_single - Run a function on a specific CPU
* @func: The function to run. This must be fast and non-blocking.
* @info: An arbitrary pointer to pass to the function.
* @wait: If true, wait until function has completed on other CPUs.
*
* Returns 0 on success, else a negative status code.
*/
. Maybe mmdrop_async() instead?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists