[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200114165739.GB140865@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 11:57:39 -0500
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the random tree
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 10:22:21AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
>
> Oh, I didn't realize I was the author. Sorry!
>
> Sure, confirmed
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
>
Hmm... the e-mail in question[1] was sent by Qian Cai, but there was a
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
in the first line of the body which attributed the patch to you. But
then e-mail continues:
Sergey didn't like the locking order .... but those code is so old,
and I have no clue how to de-couple it after checking other locks in
the splat. There is an onging effort to make all printk() as deferred,
so until that happens, workaround it for now as a short-term fix.
So did Qian Cai author the patch, and this should have been
"Reported-by Sergey Senozhatsky"? In which case I need a
Signed-off-by from Qian Cai.
This is a pretty trivial patch, but it would be good to get the
attributions and credit correct!
- Ted
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1573679785-21068-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists