[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKYAXd-CwLR3vLS_uPKOPzrEzB7v3rcdTCRR6BEhN-imeA_wPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 22:39:56 +0900
From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, sj1557.seo@...sung.com,
Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 03/14] exfat: add inode operations
2020-01-15 19:25 GMT+09:00, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 9:28 AM Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
> wrote:
>
>> + /* set FILE_INFO structure using the acquired struct exfat_dentry
>> */
>> + exfat_set_entry_time(sbi, &inode->i_ctime,
>> + &ep->dentry.file.create_time,
>> + &ep->dentry.file.create_date,
>> + &ep->dentry.file.create_tz);
>> + exfat_set_entry_time(sbi, &inode->i_mtime,
>> + &ep->dentry.file.modify_time,
>> + &ep->dentry.file.modify_date,
>> + &ep->dentry.file.modify_tz);
>> + exfat_set_entry_time(sbi, &inode->i_atime,
>> + &ep->dentry.file.access_time,
>> + &ep->dentry.file.access_date,
>> + &ep->dentry.file.access_tz);
>
> I wonder if i_ctime should be handled differently. With statx() we finally
> have
> a concept of "file creation time" in "stx_btime". so it would make sense to
> store dentry.file.create_time in there rather than in i_ctime.
Right.
>
> It seems that traditionally most file systems that cannot store ctime
> separately
> just set i_ctime and i_mtime both to what is is modify_time here, though
> fat and hpfs use i_ctime to refer to creation time.
I will check it.
Thanks for your review!
>
> Arnd
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists