[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200115134010.GA3555935@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 14:40:10 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jérôme Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com>
Cc: "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/65] Simplify and improve the wfx driver
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 12:12:07PM +0000, Jérôme Pouiller wrote:
> From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
>
> Hello all,
>
> This pull request is finally bigger than I expected, sorry.
After applying this series, I get this build error:
drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c: In function ‘wfx_cqm_bssloss_sm’:
drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:91:28: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘struct’
91 | struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr
| ^
| ;
92 | struct ieee80211_tx_control control = { };
| ~~~~~~
drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:99:3: error: ‘hdr’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘idr’?
99 | hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *)skb->data;
| ^~~
| idr
Did you even test-build this?
I could try to bisect and track down the offending commit, but that's
too much work :)
I'll wait for a v2 of this series, please fix up and resend.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists