[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1695643.cGmOzgRFCN@pc-42>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 13:50:38 +0000
From: Jérôme Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/65] Simplify and improve the wfx driver
On Wednesday 15 January 2020 14:40:10 CET Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 12:12:07PM +0000, Jérôme Pouiller wrote:
> > From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > This pull request is finally bigger than I expected, sorry.
>
> After applying this series, I get this build error:
>
> drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c: In function ‘wfx_cqm_bssloss_sm’:
> drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:91:28: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘struct’
> 91 | struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr
> | ^
> | ;
> 92 | struct ieee80211_tx_control control = { };
> | ~~~~~~
> drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c:99:3: error: ‘hdr’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘idr’?
> 99 | hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *)skb->data;
> | ^~~
> | idr
>
> Did you even test-build this?
Arf, I have not tried to built after having fixed warnings from
checkpatch. Shame on me.
--
Jérôme Pouiller
Powered by blists - more mailing lists