linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/speculation/spectre_v2: Exclude Zhaoxin CPUs from SPECTRE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200116180748.GG27148@zn.tnic>
Date:   Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:07:48 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Tony W Wang-oc <TonyWWang-oc@...oxin.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...hat.com,
        hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, luto@...nel.org,
        pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        fenghua.yu@...el.com, vineela.tummalapalli@...el.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, DavidWang@...oxin.com,
        CooperYan@...oxin.com, QiyuanWang@...oxin.com,
        HerryYang@...oxin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/speculation/spectre_v2: Exclude Zhaoxin CPUs from
 SPECTRE_V2

On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 06:09:27PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> So the right thing here is to resend both patches as a patch series
> with the conflict properly resolved.

And it is about time you started using --thread and --no-chain-reply-to
with git send-email so that your patchsets are properly threaded. See
the git-send-email(1) if something's still unclear.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette