linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mtd: spi-nor: hisi-sfc: Try to provide some clarity on which SFC we are

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <38021504.DDLjaa3fGf@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Thu, 16 Jan 2020 11:03:40 +0000
From:   <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
To:     <john.garry@...wei.com>
CC:     <broonie@...nel.org>, <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        <linuxarm@...wei.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <xuejiancheng@...ilicon.com>, <fengsheng5@...wei.com>,
        <chenxiang66@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mtd: spi-nor: hisi-sfc: Try to provide some
 clarity on which SFC we are

On Monday, December 9, 2019 4:08:08 PM EET John Garry wrote:
> The driver is for the HiSilicon FMC (Flash Memory Controller), which
> supports SPI NOR in addition other memory technologies, like SPI NAND.
> 
> Indeed, the naming in the driver is a little inappropriate, especially
> considering that there is already another HiSilicon SPI NOR flash
> controller (which I believe the FMC is derived from).
> 
> Since we now want to provide software support for this other HiSilicon
> controller, update code comments to at least try to make it clear that
> this driver is for the FMC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/Kconfig    | 4 ++--
>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/hisi-sfc.c | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 

Applied to spi-nor/next.

Thanks,
ta