linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: get rid of var ret and out jump label in kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <36f01951fb09465e9981b870c536eea5@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Jan 2020 02:03:59 +0000
From:   linmiaohe <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
CC:     "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "rkrcmar@...hat.com" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        "james.morse@....com" <james.morse@....com>,
        "julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com" <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
        "suzuki.poulose@....com" <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        "christoffer.dall@....com" <christoffer.dall@....com>,
        "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        "eric.auger@...hat.com" <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
        "andre.przywara@....com" <andre.przywara@....com>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: get rid of var ret and out jump label in
 kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug()


Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> I don't think there is anything wrong with the existing code.
> It may not be to your own taste, but is in keeping with a lot of the KVM code.
>
> If you were making changes to this code, I wouldn't object.
> But on its own, this is just churn.
>
> Thanks,
>
>          M.

Oh, I see. Many thanks for your reply and patient explaination.