linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mfd: bd70528: Fix hour register mask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200117101009.GC15507@dell>
Date:   Fri, 17 Jan 2020 10:10:09 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
Cc:     "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "mazziesaccount@...il.com" <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
        "sashal@...nel.org" <sashal@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: bd70528: Fix hour register mask

On Fri, 17 Jan 2020, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:

> 
> On Fri, 2020-01-17 at 08:57 +0100, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 07:44:07AM +0000, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> > > 
> > > Is it possible to get this in 5.4 stable - while leaving this out
> > > of
> > > current MFD tree and applying the BD71828 series to MFD?
> > 
> > We only take patches that are in Linus's tree for the stable tree,
> > unless there are very big reasons not to do so (i.e. it is totally
> > rewritten in a different way there.)
> > 
> > Once the change/fix is in Linus's tree, then you can backport it to
> > stable in a different way if you want, but you need to give lots of
> > reasons why it is done that way.
> 
> Right. Thanks for the explanation Greg. I have no _strong_ reasons -
> which means I'll split the RTC support patch in BD71828 series into two
> - first of the patches being this fix, second being the BD71828
> support. Then this fix can be taken in 5.4 after it has been merged to
> Linus' tree - the BD71828 support can be omitted from 5.4
> 
> I hope the BD71828 series could still make it to next release - but if
> it wont, then it might be in next after that :]
> 
> Lee, please skip this one, I'll do v10 of the BD71828 series where this
> fix is included as separate fix-patch.

Will look out for it.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog