lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 17 Jan 2020 10:11:06 +0000
From:   "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To:     "lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC:     "mazziesaccount@...il.com" <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
        "sashal@...nel.org" <sashal@...nel.org>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: bd70528: Fix hour register mask


On Fri, 2020-01-17 at 10:10 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2020, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 2020-01-17 at 08:57 +0100, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 07:44:07AM +0000, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> > > > Is it possible to get this in 5.4 stable - while leaving this
> > > > out
> > > > of
> > > > current MFD tree and applying the BD71828 series to MFD?
> > > 
> > > We only take patches that are in Linus's tree for the stable
> > > tree,
> > > unless there are very big reasons not to do so (i.e. it is
> > > totally
> > > rewritten in a different way there.)
> > > 
> > > Once the change/fix is in Linus's tree, then you can backport it
> > > to
> > > stable in a different way if you want, but you need to give lots
> > > of
> > > reasons why it is done that way.
> > 
> > Right. Thanks for the explanation Greg. I have no _strong_ reasons
> > -
> > which means I'll split the RTC support patch in BD71828 series into
> > two
> > - first of the patches being this fix, second being the BD71828
> > support. Then this fix can be taken in 5.4 after it has been merged
> > to
> > Linus' tree - the BD71828 support can be omitted from 5.4
> > 
> > I hope the BD71828 series could still make it to next release - but
> > if
> > it wont, then it might be in next after that :]
> > 
> > Lee, please skip this one, I'll do v10 of the BD71828 series where
> > this
> > fix is included as separate fix-patch.
> 
> Will look out for it.
> 
Thanks! It should be on it's way through the mail servers :]

Br,
	Matti Vaittinen

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ