[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN7PR08MB568424A209D22A54EEC14270DB310@BN7PR08MB5684.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 12:57:50 +0000
From: "Bean Huo (beanhuo)" <beanhuo@...ron.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>,
"alim.akhtar@...sung.com" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"avri.altman@....com" <avri.altman@....com>,
"asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
"jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
"tomas.winkler@...el.com" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
"cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>
CC: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] scsi: ufs: goto with returned value
while failed to add WL
Hi, Bart
> On 2020-01-16 13:59, Bean Huo wrote:
> > From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
> >
> > This patch is to make goto statement with failure result in case of
> > failure of adding well known LUs.
>
> Please make the subject more clear, e.g. "Fix ufshcd_probe_hba() return value in
> case ufshcd_scsi_add_wlus() fails"
>
Ok, you are always expert on English, I will change it in next version.
Thanks,
//Bean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists