[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN7PR08MB5684A86FC0922C3AC2DF93A3DB310@BN7PR08MB5684.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 12:55:03 +0000
From: "Bean Huo (beanhuo)" <beanhuo@...ron.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>,
"alim.akhtar@...sung.com" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"avri.altman@....com" <avri.altman@....com>,
"asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
"jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
"tomas.winkler@...el.com" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
"cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>
CC: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] scsi: ufs: Delete struct ufs_dev_desc
Hi, Bart
> On 2020-01-16 13:59, Bean Huo wrote:
> > struct ufs_dev_fix {
> > - struct ufs_dev_desc card;
> > + u16 wmanufacturerid;
> > + u8 *model;
> > unsigned int quirk;
> > };
> >
> > -#define END_FIX { { 0 }, 0 }
> > +#define END_FIX { 0 }
>
> A minor comment: please use { } instead of { 0 }.
>
Will be changed in the next version.
> > /* add specific device quirk */
> > #define UFS_FIX(_vendor, _model, _quirk) { \
> > - .card.wmanufacturerid = (_vendor),\
> > - .card.model = (_model), \
> > + .wmanufacturerid = (_vendor),\
> > + .model = (_model), \
> > .quirk = (_quirk), \
> > }
>
> Is this macro useful? Does it improve readability of the code? If not, how about
> removing it (maybe later)?
>
Before no better solution, I think now we just keep it.
> Anyway:
>
> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Thanks for reviewing.
//Bean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists