lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e578b820-9016-0f49-eb2c-18da631e2879@zhaoxin.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Jan 2020 09:32:10 +0800
From:   Tony W Wang-oc <TonyWWang-oc@...oxin.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
        <hpa@...or.com>, <x86@...nel.org>, <luto@...nel.org>,
        <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
        <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, <vineela.tummalapalli@...el.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <DavidWang@...oxin.com>,
        <CooperYan@...oxin.com>, <QiyuanWang@...oxin.com>,
        <HerryYang@...oxin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/speculation/spectre_v2: Exclude Zhaoxin CPUs from
 SPECTRE_V2



On 17/01/2020 02:07, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 06:09:27PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> So the right thing here is to resend both patches as a patch series
>> with the conflict properly resolved.
> 
> And it is about time you started using --thread and --no-chain-reply-to
> with git send-email so that your patchsets are properly threaded. See
> the git-send-email(1) if something's still unclear.
> 

Ok, will do like this.

Sincerely
TonyWWang-oc

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ