[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <461540.1579273958@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 15:12:38 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Scott Mayhew <smayhew@...hat.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [BISECT BUG] NFS v4 root not working after 6d972518b821 ("NFS: Add fs_context support.")
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
> mount.nfs4 -o vers=4,nolock 192.168.1.10:/srv/nfs/odroidhc1 /new_root
Okay, it looks like the mount command makes two attempts at mounting.
Firstly, it does this:
> [ 22.938314] NFSOP 'source=192.168.1.10:/srv/nfs/odroidhc1'
> [ 22.942638] NFSOP 'nolock=(null)'
> [ 22.945772] NFSOP 'vers=4.2'
> [ 22.948660] NFSOP 'addr=192.168.1.10'
> [ 22.952350] NFSOP 'clientaddr=192.168.1.12'
> [ 22.956831] NFS4: Couldn't follow remote path
Which accepts the "vers=4.2" parameter as there's no check that that is
actually valid given the configuration, but then fails later. Secondly, it
does this:
> [ 22.971001] NFSOP 'source=192.168.1.10:/srv/nfs/odroidhc1'
> [ 22.975217] NFSOP 'nolock=(null)'
> [ 22.978444] NFSOP 'vers=4'
> [ 22.981265] NFSOP 'minorversion=1'
> [ 22.984513] NFS: Value for 'minorversion' out of range
> mount.nfs4: Numerical result out of range
which fails because of the minorversion=1 specification, where the kernel
config didn't enable NFS_V4_1.
It looks like it ought to have failed prior to these patches in the same way:
case Opt_minorversion:
if (nfs_get_option_ul(args, &option))
goto out_invalid_value;
if (option > NFS4_MAX_MINOR_VERSION)
goto out_invalid_value;
mnt->minorversion = option;
break;
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists