[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200117151131.GG14879@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 16:11:31 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
Parth Shah <parth@...ux.ibm.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched, fair: Allow a small load imbalance between low
utilisation SD_NUMA domains v4
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 04:09:33PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 11:13, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net> wrote:
> > In general, the patch simply seeks to avoid unnecessary cross-node
> > migrations in the basic case where imbalances are very small. For low
> > utilisation communicating workloads, this patch generally behaves better
> > with less NUMA balancing activity. For high utilisation, there is no
> > change in behaviour.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
>
> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Thanks all!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists