[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200118040730.GA6783@workstation-portable>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 09:37:30 +0530
From: Amol Grover <frextrite@...il.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc: santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com, arm-soc <arm@...nel.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik04@...il.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drivers: soc: ti: knav_qmss_queue: Pass lockdep
expression to RCU lists
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 11:25:55AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 10:24:04AM -0800, santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com wrote:
> > On 1/17/20 5:30 AM, Amol Grover wrote:
> > > inst->handles is traversed using list_for_each_entry_rcu
> > > outside an RCU read-side critical section but under the protection
> > > of knav_dev_lock.
> > >
> > > Hence, add corresponding lockdep expression to silence false-positive
> > > lockdep warnings, and harden RCU lists.
> > >
> > > Add macro for the corresponding lockdep expression.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Amol Grover <frextrite@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > v2:
> > > - Remove rcu_read_lock_held() from lockdep expression since it is
> > > implicitly checked for.
> > >
> > Looks fine to me.
> >
> > Hi Olof, Arnd,
> > Can you please pick this one and apply to your driver-soc branch ?
> > I already sent out pull request and hence the request.
>
> Hi,
>
> Can you please email the whole patch with sign-off to
> soc@...nel.org? Otherwise it won't end up in patchwork, which is how we track
> patches and pull requests these days.
>
Thank you Santosh and Olof. I'm resending the patch to soc@...nel.org
as well.
Thanks
Amol
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Olof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists