linux-kernel - [PATCH 05/17] make build_open_flags() treat O_CREAT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200119031738.2681033-5-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Sun, 19 Jan 2020 03:17:17 +0000
From:   Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 05/17] make build_open_flags() treat O_CREAT | O_EXCL as implying O_NOFOLLOW

From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>

O_CREAT | O_EXCL means "-EEXIST if we run into a trailing symlink".
As it is, we might or might not have LOOKUP_FOLLOW in op->intent
in that case - that depends upon having O_NOFOLLOW in open flags.
It doesn't matter, since we won't be checking it in that case -
do_last() bails out earlier.

However, making sure it's not set (i.e. acting as if we had an explicit
O_NOFOLLOW) makes the behaviour more explicit and allows to reorder the
check for O_CREAT | O_EXCL in do_last() with the call of step_into()
immediately following it.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
---
 fs/namei.c | 15 +++++----------
 fs/open.c  |  4 +++-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index 3b6f60c02f8a..c19b458f66da 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -3262,22 +3262,17 @@ static int do_last(struct nameidata *nd,
 	if (unlikely(error < 0))
 		return error;
 
-	/*
-	 * create/update audit record if it already exists.
-	 */
-	audit_inode(nd->name, path.dentry, 0);
-
-	if (unlikely((open_flag & (O_EXCL | O_CREAT)) == (O_EXCL | O_CREAT))) {
-		path_to_nameidata(&path, nd);
-		return -EEXIST;
-	}
-
 	seq = 0;	/* out of RCU mode, so the value doesn't matter */
 	inode = d_backing_inode(path.dentry);
 finish_lookup:
 	error = step_into(nd, &path, 0, inode, seq);
 	if (unlikely(error))
 		return error;
+
+	if (unlikely((open_flag & (O_EXCL | O_CREAT)) == (O_EXCL | O_CREAT))) {
+		audit_inode(nd->name, nd->path.dentry, 0);
+		return -EEXIST;
+	}
 finish_open:
 	/* Why this, you ask?  _Now_ we might have grown LOOKUP_JUMPED... */
 	error = complete_walk(nd);
diff --git a/fs/open.c b/fs/open.c
index b62f5c0923a8..ba7009a5dd1a 100644
--- a/fs/open.c
+++ b/fs/open.c
@@ -1014,8 +1014,10 @@ static inline int build_open_flags(int flags, umode_t mode, struct open_flags *o
 
 	if (flags & O_CREAT) {
 		op->intent |= LOOKUP_CREATE;
-		if (flags & O_EXCL)
+		if (flags & O_EXCL) {
 			op->intent |= LOOKUP_EXCL;
+			flags |= O_NOFOLLOW;
+		}
 	}
 
 	if (flags & O_DIRECTORY)
-- 
2.20.1