linux-kernel - [PATCH 06/17] handle_mounts(): start building a sane wrapper for follow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200119031738.2681033-6-viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Sun, 19 Jan 2020 03:17:18 +0000
From:   Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 06/17] handle_mounts(): start building a sane wrapper for follow_managed()

From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>

All callers of follow_managed() follow it on success with the same steps -
d_backing_inode(path->dentry) is calculated and stored into some struct inode *
variable and, in all but one case, an unsigned variable (nd->seq to be) is
zeroed.  The single exception is lookup_fast() and there zeroing is correct
thing to do - not doing it is a pointless microoptimization.

	Add a wrapper for follow_managed() that would do that combination.
It's mostly a vehicle for code massage - it will be changing quite a bit,
and the current calling conventions are by no means final.  Right now it
takes path, nameidata and (as out params) inode and seq, similar to
__follow_mount_rcu().  Which will soon get folded into it...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
---
 fs/namei.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index c19b458f66da..4c867d0970d5 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -1304,6 +1304,18 @@ static bool __follow_mount_rcu(struct nameidata *nd, struct path *path,
 		!(path->dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_NEED_AUTOMOUNT);
 }
 
+static inline int handle_mounts(struct path *path, struct nameidata *nd,
+			  struct inode **inode, unsigned int *seqp)
+{
+	int ret = follow_managed(path, nd);
+
+	if (likely(ret >= 0)) {
+		*inode = d_backing_inode(path->dentry);
+		*seqp = 0; /* out of RCU mode, so the value doesn't matter */
+	}
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
 {
 	struct inode *inode = nd->inode;
@@ -1514,7 +1526,6 @@ static int lookup_fast(struct nameidata *nd,
 	struct vfsmount *mnt = nd->path.mnt;
 	struct dentry *dentry, *parent = nd->path.dentry;
 	int status = 1;
-	int err;
 
 	/*
 	 * Rename seqlock is not required here because in the off chance
@@ -1584,10 +1595,7 @@ static int lookup_fast(struct nameidata *nd,
 
 	path->mnt = mnt;
 	path->dentry = dentry;
-	err = follow_managed(path, nd);
-	if (likely(err > 0))
-		*inode = d_backing_inode(path->dentry);
-	return err;
+	return handle_mounts(path, nd, inode, seqp);
 }
 
 /* Fast lookup failed, do it the slow way */
@@ -1761,12 +1769,9 @@ static int walk_component(struct nameidata *nd, int flags)
 			return PTR_ERR(path.dentry);
 
 		path.mnt = nd->path.mnt;
-		err = follow_managed(&path, nd);
+		err = handle_mounts(&path, nd, &inode, &seq);
 		if (unlikely(err < 0))
 			return err;
-
-		seq = 0;	/* we are already out of RCU mode */
-		inode = d_backing_inode(path.dentry);
 	}
 
 	return step_into(nd, &path, flags, inode, seq);
@@ -2233,11 +2238,9 @@ static int handle_lookup_down(struct nameidata *nd)
 			return -ECHILD;
 	} else {
 		dget(path.dentry);
-		err = follow_managed(&path, nd);
+		err = handle_mounts(&path, nd, &inode, &seq);
 		if (unlikely(err < 0))
 			return err;
-		inode = d_backing_inode(path.dentry);
-		seq = 0;
 	}
 	path_to_nameidata(&path, nd);
 	nd->inode = inode;
@@ -3258,12 +3261,9 @@ static int do_last(struct nameidata *nd,
 		got_write = false;
 	}
 
-	error = follow_managed(&path, nd);
+	error = handle_mounts(&path, nd, &inode, &seq);
 	if (unlikely(error < 0))
 		return error;
-
-	seq = 0;	/* out of RCU mode, so the value doesn't matter */
-	inode = d_backing_inode(path.dentry);
 finish_lookup:
 	error = step_into(nd, &path, 0, inode, seq);
 	if (unlikely(error))
-- 
2.20.1