[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d375eb78623261eb334caaa3980905115aa1bf8.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 01:19:09 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] printf: add support for %de
On Mon, 2020-01-20 at 09:55 +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this is an reiteration of my patch from some time ago that introduced
> %dE with the same semantic. Back then this resulted in the support for
> %pe which was less contentious.
>
> I still consider %de (now with a small 'e' to match %pe) useful.
I still think this is not a good idea at all.
There really should be no need to introduce more
odd vsprintf extensions.
%p<foo> should be enough.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists