[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vei9_xqxiiAWBrcMp3yOWmMNmdRmNEwO=Ht+URsnoD4Pw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:32:12 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] printf: add support for %de
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 10:57 AM Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> this is an reiteration of my patch from some time ago that introduced
> %dE with the same semantic. Back then this resulted in the support for
> %pe which was less contentious.
>
> I still consider %de (now with a small 'e' to match %pe) useful.
Please, don't spread the extensions over the standard specifiers. The
%p* extensions are enough for my opinion.
NAK.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists