[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e5d3656d-04a1-dd1b-e847-fb063e56a987@lucaceresoli.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 10:22:07 +0100
From: Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/26] docs: i2c: sort index logically
Hi Jean,
On 20/01/20 10:08, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Luca,
>
> On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 23:49:47 +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
>> The index page currently lists sections in alphabetical file order without
>> caring about their content. Sort sections based on their content logically,
>> according to the following structure:
>>
>> * Intro to I2C/SMBus and their usage in Linux: summary, i2c-protocol,
>> smbus-protocol, instantiating-devices, busses/index, i2c-topology,
>> muxes/i2c-mux-gpio
>> * Implementing drivers: writing-clients, dev-interface,
>> dma-considerations, fault-codes, functionality
>> * Debugging: gpio-fault-injection, i2c-stub
>> * Slave I2C: slave-interface, slave-eeprom-backend
>> * Advanced: ten-bit-addresses
>> * Obsolete info: upgrading-clients, old-module-parameters
>
> Good idea. I wonder, would there be a way to materialize these group
> names in the documentation itself? I found it useful when reviewing the
> patch, but in the long term it would be even more useful if the end
> readers would see them too.
I had the same idea, but didn't find an obvious way to do it with the
ReST/Sphynx syntax. I have also browsed through a few index pages for
other subsystems and they all have a flat list too, so for the moment I
gave up.
Anybody has hints on how to do this in a clean way?
>> diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/index.rst b/Documentation/i2c/index.rst
>> index a0fbaf6d0675..bd0ff9d00793 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/i2c/index.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/i2c/index.rst
>> @@ -7,27 +7,26 @@ I2C/SMBus Subsystem
>> .. toctree::
>> :maxdepth: 1
>>
>> + summary
>> + i2c-protocol
>> + smbus-protocol
>> + instantiating-devices
>> + busses/index
>> + i2c-topology
>> + muxes/i2c-mux-gpio
>> + writing-clients
>> dev-interface
>> dma-considerations
>> fault-codes
>> functionality
>> gpio-fault-injection
>> - i2c-protocol
>> i2c-stub
>> - i2c-topology
>> - instantiating-devices
>> - old-module-parameters
>> - slave-eeprom-backend
>> slave-interface
>> - smbus-protocol
>> - summary
>> + slave-eeprom-backend
>> ten-bit-addresses
>> upgrading-clients
>> - writing-clients
>> -
>> - muxes/i2c-mux-gpio
>> + old-module-parameters
>>
>> - busses/index
>>
>
> You end up with 2 blank lines in a row here, ideally there should be
> only one left.
Good catch, thanks, will fix in v2.
--
Luca
Powered by blists - more mailing lists