[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200120102730.4eb9116b@endymion>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 10:27:30 +0100
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
To: Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/26] docs: i2c: summary: extend introduction
On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 23:49:48 +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> - state the "official" name (I²C, not I2C, according to the spec) at
> the beginning but keep using the more practical I2C elsewhere
> - mention some known different names
> - add link to the specification document
Indentation is inconsistent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>
> ---
> Documentation/i2c/summary.rst | 18 ++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/summary.rst b/Documentation/i2c/summary.rst
> index 3a24eac17375..b7d3e620155b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/i2c/summary.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/i2c/summary.rst
> @@ -2,12 +2,18 @@
> I2C and SMBus
> =============
>
> -I2C (pronounce: I squared C) is a protocol developed by Philips. It is a
> -slow two-wire protocol (variable speed, up to 400 kHz), with a high speed
> -extension (3.4 MHz). It provides an inexpensive bus for connecting many
> -types of devices with infrequent or low bandwidth communications needs.
> -I2C is widely used with embedded systems. Some systems use variants that
> -don't meet branding requirements, and so are not advertised as being I2C.
> +I²C (pronounce: I squared C and written I2C in the kernel documentation) is
> +a protocol developed by Philips. It is a slow two-wire protocol (variable
> +speed, up to 400 kHz), with a high speed extension (3.4 MHz). It provides
> +an inexpensive bus for connecting many types of devices with infrequent or
> +low bandwidth communications needs. I2C is widely used with embedded
> +systems. Some systems use variants that don't meet branding requirements,
> +and so are not advertised as being I2C but with different names, e.g. TWI
> +(Two Wire Interface), IIC.
Maybe that's just me but "but with different names" sounds strange to
me in the sentence construct. Maybe "but come under different names"
instead?
> +
> +The official I2C specification is the `"I2C-bus specification and user
> +manual" (UM10204) <https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/user-guide/UM10204.pdf>`_
> +published by NXP Semiconductors.
>
> SMBus (System Management Bus) is based on the I2C protocol, and is mostly
> a subset of I2C protocols and signaling. Many I2C devices will work on an
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
Powered by blists - more mailing lists