lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 21 Jan 2020 09:11:48 +0000
From:   Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To:     Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>,
        Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
        Parth Shah <parth@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched, fair: Allow a small load imbalance between low
 utilisation SD_NUMA domains v4

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 02:25:01PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net> [2020-01-20 18:21:00]:
> 
> > Understood. At the moment, I'm going to assume that the patch has zero
> > impact on your workload but confirmation that the other test programs
> > trigger no traces would be appreciated.
> > 
> 
> Yes, I confirm there were no traces when run with other test programs too.
> 

Ok, great, thanks for confirming that!

Peter or Ingo, I think at this point all review comments have been
addressed. Is there anything else you'd like before picking the patch
up?

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ